Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:16 am
I find it hard to believe the argument that if you make a proper starter that your yeast is less healthy than the yeast in the dormant/dry state. So I started this reply ready to list the reasons ...... activating metabolism, getting reproduction going so that you have new young cells and an increased cell count, etc ....
but as I was thinking it through, it starts to make some sense. I think the key is "proper" starter vs "starter". If you just pitch dry yeast into starter wort, it's not much different than sprinkling on top of a batch of your beer wort - you'll immediately kill half your yeast. And think about how many cells you are actually adding from a pack of dry yeast - 2-3 times that of a WL vial or Wyeast Activator? In order to get effective reproduction, you would therefore need a starter volume 2 to 3 times that of what we might be doing normally for a given type of liquid yeast.
In the end, I think it boils down to more "what's the point?" practicality -- it's much simpler to rehydrate the yeast than make starter wort, you can add go ferm to improve viability and activity even further, and by doing so you accomplish the same thing as making a starter (killing half the yeast then rejuvenating the other half so they start reproducing); and from a cost-benefit ratio, dry yeast is inexpensive, large starter worts cost money, time involved in making starters has value ......
-- Scott
On Tap - Janet's Brown, Easy-Jack/SNPA mash-up
Primary - BCS Saison with rye
Secondary - Cabernet Sauvingon