Kodos wrote:I'm most likely missing something here, 'cause this chemistry stuff tends to escape me a little, but my understanding was that heating SMM in the kettle creates DMS.
The boil then in turn drives off the DMS. So while the OP might be correct in saying DMS is driven off so easily it's hardly worth worrying about, it's the SMM being continuously converted throughout the boil that causes the problem.
It seems very simple now. Putting it all together, SMM is created while the grain is growing. This amount is very negligible, but in one region, Central Europe, it seems a bit less negligible. During the kilning process, some or all SMM is destroyed. If a grain is very lightly kilned, the SMM is not destroyed which later creates DMS in the boil. There is only a finite amount of SMM in any grain so it doesn't go on creating DMS forever; just until it's gone. Lightly kilned, British, American, Canadian, and Austrailian malts don't contain much SMM so there is very little associated DMS. British malts in particular have practically no SMM at all. However, in Central Europe barley has been selectively bred to include a larger amount of SMM, enough to survive a long boil, because they enjoy a tiny bit of DMS flavor in their beer. I'm saying that they've selectively bred it that way because they're the lone outlyers. Homebrewers using a Central European malt, like Weyermann Munich Malt, in their American Pale ale could run into a bit of a DMS problem, but it will be very slight, and undetectable to most who are not trying desperately to find a flaw. I hope that sums it up. Love,
The Beaver Barber