Sun May 19, 2013 5:34 am
It's well-known fact that trub contains several things good for yeast health, but not all off-flavors are products or byproducts of the yeast. I noticed a few oversights in the aforementioned paper, but that aside, they only tested something we've known all along. On a homebrew level it's nearly impossible to remove all of the trub from the wort before we put it into our fermentors & that residual turbidity is just fine. Putting it all in there is going to create off-flavors that have absolutely nothing to do with the yeast or yeast-derived byproducts. If your beer sits on something, it's going to leach flavors from it. Oak is a good example. Also, the good stuff you could get from trub can be added in other ways, like that yeast nutrient you should already be using. If that much trub had a bunch of positive effects & no negative effects why in the world would the pros be investing tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars into equipment that is solely designed to remove it, such as pre-filters & dedicated whirlpools? Because it has a greater negative effect than all of the positives combined.
In other words, get as much out as you can. There still will be some left in solution & again, that's fine. If yeast health/fermentation is a problem, trub is not the solution. There are plenty of tried/tested/proven ways to improve that without the negative effects trub presents.
Lee
"Show me on this doll where the internet hurt you."
"Every zoo is a petting zoo if you man the fuck up."

BN Army // 13th Mountain Division
