maxwell wrote:Yes, it has been in the bucket for 8 months. There is some acetic character in this beer. My first Flanders (first sour in general) so I have no idea whether glass would produce something really different. Jamil and Raj Apte have presumably done this many many times and if they say that the bucket lets in too much oxygen, I'm inclined to believe them.
Raj Apte on his site IIRC does not discuss trials with buckets, he does calculate the oxygen permeability of a bucket. One issue with his calculations as pointed out by Old Sock here:
http://www.themadfermentationist.com/20 ... elare.htmlIs that if the figures Sparrow reports in Wild Brews for acetic acid content in Rodenbach Grand Cru and time spent on the foudres is correct, Apte's calculation for oxygen permeability of the foudres must be incorrect (and backing into the oxygen permeability of the foudres from Sparrow's number gives you a number very close to Apte's calculation for the bucket, which may explain why there has been at least one NHC gold medal winning Flander's Red made in a bucket, see below).
Jamil, if you look at his old posts on the B3 forum, advocated for making Flanders Red in a bucket. Not sure when or why he changed his advice but his Flanders Red that won NHC was made in a bucket assuming the B3 posts were honest/correct.
We all "know" that aging Flander's Red in buckets will make it too acetic but I have yet to run into anyone that managed to make a beer more acetic than Rodenbach Grand Cru or La Folie in a bucket.
I'm wondering if oak pegs in carboys is a solution in search of a problem. I made my first one a couple of months back. I'm going to try some different methods and I'll report my results but I've just been noticing that the "my Flanders Red was too acetic" anecdotes don't seem to exist.