I have heard many times on the Brewing Network Jamil and the other brewers state that both company's WL and Wyeast make great products and he would use either one. It seems like they always use White Labs over Wyeast. I was thinking about the pro's and con's of both
WL-Cool almost indestructible vial that you can reuse for water salts ETC.
Wyeast-Activater, makes sure your yeast get active before you pitch into starter/wert, you can also tell somewhat how viable they are by the amount of time it takes for the package to swell.
UV and O2 barrier package-Pretty obvious the benefits of this.
This might be small addition but Wyeast prints the exact date which the yeast was made. I could only find a "use before" date on the White labs vial which was about 3 months from the date i purchased it. So judging the yeasts viability would be hard.
If I remember correctly both WL and Wyeast have the same amount of yeast cells.
So it seems to me that Wyeast has a bit of a edge when it comes to their yeast. Maybe its just cause I am partial beings its made 10 miles from my house. I would think that the brew casters would see a advantage in this yeast and would use it but they don't. Is there something I am missing? Does WL have any other benefits? If they don't I am still curious as to why the brew casters choose it over Wyeast.







