Bruck wrote:I would suggest a diacytal rest first.
A "diacetyl" rest is not necessary (or really beneficial) if you intend to carry out traditional lagering. In this case the wort would be transferred when fermentation is nearly complete making sure that quite a bit of yeast gets carried over to the lagering vessel. Having the yeast is very important as it is they that will consume the diacetyl as it is formed. No yeast, the diacetyl stays in the beer.
If you are looking for faster lagering and/or transfer clear beer to the lagering tank then elevated temperature will speed the degradation of acetolactate but then yeast need to be added back in to clean up the diacetyl formed in this process. The usual compromise is to raise the temperature while the yeast are still in suspension but not to raise it to the point where the yeast are damaged so that they can clean up the diacetyl at the end of the rest.
The diacetyl rest (which is really an alpha acetolactate rest) is the child of modern commercial brewing practice in which 3 months (the traditional time period) lagering periods are not economically feasible. Of course the homebrewer can do it any way he wants: tradional, quick or something in between.
My lagers, when I used to check it, generally showed diacetyl concentrations around 0.1 mg/L which is right at the threshold and just where it ought to be (IMO) in most lagers but especially in Bohemian Pils where it is an important part of the style. I have never used diacetyl rests. I was, several years ago, talking to a professional brewer who opined "There is no place for diacetyl in lager beer." I asked him if they knew that in Pilsen (0.2 mg/L diacetyl).
Note WRT the diacetyl levels mentioned: the reported value for diacetyl given by the ASBC methods (except chromatography) include 2,3 butane dione and acetolactate and so are really measures of "diacetyl potential".