Beer Forum

Posted: **Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:23 am**

Thought this would be of interest

http://zythophile.wordpress.com/

Posted: **Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:31 am**

Maybe the piece should've been entitled, "Subtle inaccuracies in the popularly accepted history of IPAs that should be corrected." The author is really picking some nits, IMHO.

Posted: **Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:41 am**

BeerPal wrote:Maybe the piece should've been entitled, "Subtle inaccuracies in the popularly accepted history of IPAs that should be corrected." The author is really picking some nits, IMHO.

Maybe, but they are points regularly used by beer journalist and beer origination's that make money of such information and can be easily corrected

Posted: **Thu Aug 04, 2011 7:57 am**

oblivious wrote:
BeerPal wrote:Maybe the piece should've been entitled, "Subtle inaccuracies in the popularly accepted history of IPAs that should be corrected." The author is really picking some nits, IMHO.

Maybe, but they are points regularly used by beer journalist and beer origination's that make money of such information and can be easily corrected

True enough. Journalists should strive for accuracy, something that happens far too infrequently in today's pressure cooker news media environment.

Beer Forum

Four IPA myths that need to be stamped out for IPAday

Four IPA myths that need to be stamped out for IPAday

Re: Four IPA myths that need to be stamped out for IPAday

Re: Four IPA myths that need to be stamped out for IPAday

Re: Four IPA myths that need to be stamped out for IPAday