bikefoolery wrote:In general I'm against legislating taxes to level a playing field
I am as well, except for small and microbusinesses, biased as I am. My problem is the tax system is weighted towards large corporations and multi-million dollar businesses. If any business should be getting breaks, it's the startups and micros.
BTW bumping the 2 million cap to a 6 million cap for a 'small brewery' only helps one brewer: Sam Adams. Congrats Sam Adams share holders. You've won the lobby congress game.
Pretty much what it boils down to being. Yay, you have lobbying power. In truth, a "small brewery" is like porn. I can't clearly define it, but I know it when i see it. Two million barrels of beer is 62 million gallons or 496 million pints. To me that is not a "small" brewery. That is a fuck-ton of beer. Sam Adams brand is a large craft beer. Congrats. But fuck Boston Beer Company for thinking they are small. If you want to help out with taxes, how about making the first 2,000 barrels tax free. That would help out a lot of nano and micro breweries that employ maybe up to 4 people. I think that would do a lot more good.
Our children will pay for all the tax cuts until there is a balanced budget (cuts in services and/or raises in taxes to zero out income vs expenditures). While craft brewing in general is growing at 8% a year(last I heard), I don't see why they would need a tax cut to weather the current economic conditions.
I don't think the government makes that much money off alcohol taxes compared to other taxes that it would effect the budget a practical amount where notice should be taken and addressed. In the grand scheme of things, it's not a revenue issue as much as a spending issue. If Americans and the government would cut the luxury bull shit and simply live within their means, this country would prosper. So much money is wasted on stupid shit that doesn't need to be spent. That's the issue, not revenue in general. The more you make, the more you spend.